TreeView performance comparison#
Flexible TreeView for .NET offers exceptional performance, surpassing competitors by up to 230x. When managing large datasets, Flexible TreeView is the only component that completes operations in seconds, while other controls either struggle or fail to respond.
Benchmark implementation#
The following pseudocode was used to measure node addition performance in both modes:
Performance results#
Below are the benchmark results showing the time (in seconds) taken to add the specified number of nodes.
Product | Mode | 1,000 nodes | 10,000 nodes | 100,000 nodes | 1,000,000 nodes |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Flexible TreeView | Unbound | 0.05 | 0.20 | 1.24 | 12.17 |
Flexible TreeView | Bound | 0.04 | 0.06 | 0.39 | 3.02 |
.NET TreeView | Unbound | 0.23 | 2.57 | 61.74 | unresponsive |
DevExpress XtraTreeList | Unbound | 0.05 | 0.31 | 88.53 | unresponsive |
DevExpress XtraTreeList | Bound | 0.04 | 0.06 | 0.17 | 0.76 |
Telerik RadTreeListView | Unbound | 0.27 | 2.37 | 107.13 | unresponsive |
Telerik RadTreeListView | Bound | 0.25 | 1.51 | 72.30 | unresponsive |
ComponentOne C1TreeView | Unbound | 1.09 | 3.74 | 60.69 | unresponsive |
ComponentOne C1TreeView | Bound | 1.16 | 4.49 | 87.17 | unresponsive |
* All benchmarks were performed on identical hardware configuration as of January 2025 to ensure fair comparison between all tested controls.